Charter for Ethical University Governance

---

Provost
• Oversee academic programs and policies with fairness and integrity
• Promote open dialogue among faculty and students
• Ensure academic contributions align with university values and mission
• Address challenges and mistakes transparently, using them as learning opportunities
• Support faculty and staff in their professional development and ethical conduct

Academic Senate
• Serve as the official voice of the faculty in academic and professional matters
• Advise on curriculum development, degree requirements, grading policies, and academic standards
• Oversee academic governance, quality assurance, and risk management
• Act as a principal forum for open discussion and deliberation of academic matters
• Provide academic input to the university’s strategic plan and policies
• Critically evaluate educational innovations and foster a culture of evidence-based improvement

Corporate Officers 

Aligning corporate and academic leadership roles is a powerful way to developing institutional accountability in higher education. When these two leadership spheres operate in concert, the university benefits from unified direction, transparency, and a culture that values both outcomes and the processes behind them.
Key ways alignment fosters institutional accountability:
• Unified Vision and Goals:
• Shared Responsibility and Accountability:.
• Transparent Processes and Communication:
• Integrated Decision-Making and Resource Allocation:
• Enhanced Integrity and Public Trust:

 • Shared Responsibility and Accountability:
By distributing responsibility for institutional goals across both corporate and academic leaders, accountability becomes a shared endeavor rather than the burden of a single office or group. This means that everyone, from the boardroom to the classroom, is invested in upholding standards, responding to challenges, and learning from mistakes.
• Transparent Processes and Communication:
Alignment encourages open communication channels, ensuring that decisions and rationales are transparent to all stakeholders. This transparency builds trust and allows for constructive feedback, making it easier to address problems and correct course when necessary.

• Integrated Decision-Making and Resource Allocation:
Joint strategic planning and regular meetings between corporate and academic leaders help align resources with institutional priorities, reduce duplication, and streamline operations. This integration leads to more effective oversight and the ability to respond quickly and collectively to challenges.
• Culture of Learning and Improvement:
When both leadership groups commit to continuous professional development, routine assessment, and honest reflection on failures, it normalizes learning from mistakes and drives ongoing improvement. Leaders model this mindset, encouraging the entire institution to see accountability as a pathway to growth, not just compliance.

• Enhanced Integrity and Public Trust:
A visibly aligned leadership team that holds itself accountable—both in public statements and in daily practice—strengthens the institution’s integrity and its reputation with students, faculty, funders, and the broader community.
In summary, aligning corporate and academic leadership roles creates a system where accountability is embedded in every level of the institution, making it easier to uphold high standards, adapt to change, and foster a resilient, ethical, and forward-thinking university